Nobody takes custody
A copier places orders in accounts you already hold. Your funds stay at your broker in your name. If a service asks you to deposit money with it, it is not a copier.
Orders in, never funds outCopy trading
Three questions arrive in that one sentence: is it allowed, is the tooling real, and does it make money. For someone mirroring their own accounts the first two are straightforward, and the third has nothing to do with copying at all.
This is the case almost everyone is actually asking about, and it is unremarkable. You hold several futures accounts. You place an order in one and software places the matching orders in the others. Every account is yours, every order is yours, and the money never leaves your broker.
The only thing a copier removes is the typing. It does not change who is trading, what is being traded, or where the funds sit. A trader with four accounts and a copier is doing exactly what a trader with four accounts and fast hands is doing.
In Quanify this is enforced rather than assumed: every account in the group is one you connected, and there is no configuration in which a fill reaches an account you do not own.
Brokers publish execution events. Software reacts to them and places orders. There is no trick in the mechanism, and it is the same mechanism a desk has used to manage multiple accounts for as long as electronic order entry has existed.
What gives the phrase a reputation is a different product entirely: paid signal rooms selling access to someone else's trades, with claims attached. That is a claims problem, not a copying problem, and it has recognisable tells worth knowing even if you are only ever mirroring yourself.
A copier places orders in accounts you already hold. Your funds stay at your broker in your name. If a service asks you to deposit money with it, it is not a copier.
Orders in, never funds outA guaranteed return in a leveraged product is not a bold claim, it is a false one. Futures can lose more than the move you were expecting.
Leverage cuts both waysA screenshot is not a track record. The useful questions are what the largest drawdown was, over what period, and on which instrument.
Ask for the worst monthFor most futures traders this is the only rule that actually decides anything, and it is contractual rather than legal. A firm can permit or restrict mirroring across its accounts because it is their capital.
Rules differ between firms, and frequently between evaluation and funded accounts at the same firm. They also change. The reliable move is to read the current rulebook for the specific account you intend to arm — search it for "copy", "mirror", "duplicate" and "multiple accounts" — and to ask support in writing if a clause is ambiguous.
Copy trading and prop firms covers which clauses to look for and what they are usually guarding against.
A copier is a distribution mechanism. It reproduces your results with high fidelity, in both directions, and it has no opinion about which direction you are heading.
Two things genuinely change when you run several accounts on one leader, and both make outcomes worse rather than better if you ignore them.
Costs multiply with accounts. Commission and fees are charged per account. A strategy that was marginal on one account is worse on four.
Concentration looks like diversification. Four accounts following one leader is one position held four times. On a bad day every account loses together, because it is the same trade.
The honest framing: copying makes a good process bigger and a bad process bigger. It does not improve the process.
None of this requires funding anything, and all of it is worth doing once.
Mirroring your own accounts is ordinary trading with the typing removed — your orders, your accounts, your funds at your broker. The mechanism is unremarkable. The reputation the phrase carries comes from paid signal rooms making claims about returns, which is a separate product.
Copying between accounts you own is ordinary trading. Trading other people's accounts for compensation, or publishing signals as investment advice, is a regulated activity in most jurisdictions and needs proper advice. Prop firms separately set their own rules by contract, which can be stricter.
Only in proportion to what you are copying. A copier reproduces results identically in both directions. It also multiplies commission across accounts and concentrates risk rather than spreading it, so a marginal process generally gets worse when copied, not better.
It should not, and Quanify does not. Your funds stay in your own accounts at your own broker; the software only places orders. Any service asking you to deposit funds with it is doing something other than copying trades.
It varies by firm and often by account type, and firms usually distinguish between mirroring your own accounts and executing a third party's signals. It is a contract question — read the current rules for the specific account before you arm anything.
Connect a sim or evaluation account and run the whole product against it before you point anything at live money. Nothing about the setup changes when you do.