Copy Trader
You decide. You take the trade on your leader account the way you always have, and your other accounts follow. Nothing about your process changes except the typing.
The signal is your own fillCopy trading
If you trade more than one futures account, you have already met the problem: the same trade, typed four times, four chances to get it wrong. Copy trading is the fix. You trade one account normally and the others reproduce it automatically, each at its own size.
Almost nobody running futures has one account any more. There is a personal account, a funded account, an evaluation that needs to stay alive, and sometimes a second funded account at a different firm. They are all supposed to be trading the same thing.
Doing that by hand does not scale. Four windows, four order tickets, four different position sizes, and every one of them has to be right while the market is moving. The second and third fills are always worse than the first, and the account you forget is the one that was already long.
A copier removes the typing. You trade the account you actually watch — the leader — and every other account you own is a follower that reproduces the fill at its own size, in the same instant, without you touching it.
Every account in a group is one you connected and enabled yourself.
This is the part that makes it usable rather than dangerous. Copying one-for-one is fine when every account is identical, and no one's accounts are identical.
A four-lot trade that is routine on a personal account can put a 50K evaluation most of the way to its daily limit. So each follower carries its own whole-number multiplier, applied before the order leaves: the same leader fill lands as four contracts on one account, eight on another, twelve on a third.
The multipliers are whole numbers deliberately. Contracts are indivisible, so a 0.5× multiplier has to round somewhere, and a tool that rounds quietly is sizing you wrong without telling you. If you want half the size, lead with half the size.
A muted account sits the trade out. The rest of the cascade never notices.
A copier has to learn that the leader traded. There are two ways to do that, and they are not equivalent.
Polling asks the broker "what does this account hold now?" every few seconds and infers what changed. It is simple, and it is wrong in exactly the situations that matter: two fills inside one interval look like one, and an entry that reverses inside the interval looks like nothing happened at all.
Execution events are pushed by the broker the moment an order fills, each carrying its own id. The copier is being told what happened rather than deducing it, and it can key on that id so a retransmission is recognised as the same fill instead of a second one.
Quanify mirrors on execution events. That is why partial fills reproduce correctly: a leader order that fills in three pieces produces three events and three mirrored fills, rather than one guess after the fact.
The pitch is identical everywhere. These are the questions that actually distinguish them.
Worth being straight about, because it is the one thing a copier genuinely changes about your trading.
Four accounts on one leader is one position held four times. It looks like more accounts and it behaves like more size. A bad day is a bad day in every account simultaneously, which is the opposite of diversification.
Costs multiply. Commission is charged per account. A strategy that was marginal on one account is worse on four.
That is what per-account sizing is for. Each account trades a size appropriate to its own balance rather than the leader's, so a trade that is routine on a large account is not disproportionate on a small one.
Both put orders on several accounts without you typing them. What differs is who decides.
You decide. You take the trade on your leader account the way you always have, and your other accounts follow. Nothing about your process changes except the typing.
The signal is your own fillYour strategy decides. A TradingView alert or a script fires a webhook and the order is placed with no one at the desk.
The signal is a webhookBoth run on the same broker connections. An account can move between automated and manual without being re-onboarded, and Copy Trader takes precedence while it is armed.
No second setupCopy trading is when one account's trades are automatically reproduced on other accounts. In Quanify those are all accounts you own: one is designated the leader, the rest are followers, and each follower places its own real order at its own size when the leader fills.
The copier receives an execution event from the broker when the leader fills, resolves the contract, applies each follower's whole-number multiplier and risk limits, and places a separate order for each follower on that follower's own broker connection. Partial fills are mirrored one for one.
Yes, as long as both are accounts you own and both platforms are supported. The leader and its followers do not have to sit on the same connection or the same broker.
No. Quanify holds the broker session server-side, so copies continue with your machine off. Desktop copiers do need to stay running, which is the usual reason people end up renting a VPS.
Nothing. Quanify never closes a position on your behalf — not on power-off, not on cancellation, not when a group is deleted. New orders stop; anything already open stays at your broker under your control.
No. With copy trading you make the trading decision and your other accounts follow your fill. With automation a strategy makes the decision and fires a webhook. Quanify does both on the same accounts, and Copy Trader takes precedence while it is armed.
Connect a sim or evaluation account and run the whole product against it before you point anything at live money. Nothing about the setup changes when you do.